03 June 2025

Toiling In Obscurity, Part Two

Recently, it’s occurred to me that there’s an aphoristic quality to cartoons in that an artist might compress a great deal of background material into a very small sample. I’ve also considered that explaining things in "Toiling In Obscurity" may have helped any possibly interested parties to see some of the thinking behind "Thus Spake Steve Bannon." So, I thought I'd publish some essays I began about a decade ago that now serve as backing information and inspiration for what I’m doing with the "Scum (Back) On Top" series. But first, I’ll elaborate on some of the themes and references in my most recent cartoon.

 

Panel 1:  The current president is represented only as 1) a mostly featureless orange head with a black oval for the mouth, a vertical black line in the middle top, a right ear with a 2" x 2" white bandage (as worn in public appearances after the assassination attempt), wearing the black Bearskin hat with MAGA in red letters given to him by Russian ruler Vladimir Putin in the first Trumprussian regime; and 2) an unattached right arm raised with fist clenched in the gesture he made after said attempt. (Along with his exclamation, "Fight! Fight!" this made some see him as a “champion.”)

He is lying in bed as his (now iconic) raised right arm unintentionally suggests that he is stretching while yawning. A recurring dream begins with him giving a great (of course) speech at a packed (of course) rally, with good people on both sides. (Alluding to his statement trying to condemn violence in the aftermath of the torch-lit rally of Brownshirts in Charlottesville, Virginia on 11-12 August 2017. He seems to have understood he was supposed to condemn violence as such but constantly gave away the impression that he mostly wanted to lay the blame on “the other side” -- i.e., the counter-protestors who were NOT Nazis and Klansmen.)

Panel 2: POTUS has bothered me for a long time; it's too reminiscent of Caesar (which was a standard, informal "title" for any Roman Emperor -- viz., "Render unto Caesar....") and is also an example of the "telescoping" of words (as identified by George Orwell) in twentieth century political language, of police states in particular -- viz., Gestapo, USSR, USA, etc.

The specific satire on "home schooling" involves it (along with "private schools") as symptomatic of conservative reaction against public schools in the United States, and mainly the racial integration thereof (under the guise of better school standards and "moral [religious] instruction"). So, such teaching might ensure proper spelling for specialized "Biblical" terms but not be so strong on civics. And of course, there’s an allusion to what the current president said during an "Access Hollywood" interview.

Panels 2-3: In September of 2009, President Barack Obama addressed a joint session of the US Congress to propose a national healthcare plan (which became the Affordable Care Act). Feeling provoked by the darkness he observed in the vicinity of the president, and further emboldened by Koch funding, a Republican Representative from South Carolina named Joe Wilson upset the decorum and respect traditionally given to the US chief of state by standing up and shouting, "You lie!" I've been highly amused at the idea of something similar (but perhaps ambiguous) occurring to the current president.

09 January 2025

2025 National Football League Pro Bowl

The National Football League Pro Bowl began to go downhill at roughly the same time as fan voting was implemented (counting as a third percentage alongside those of the coaches' and the players' votes, each also a third). With the rise of the internets, that impact became more pronounced and the results more dubious. Around two decades ago, the disparity led me to annually post at this blog a "Non-Pro Bowl-Selected All-Pros" list of players who (I believed) were at least as, and often MORE deserving of being Pro Bowl starters. Not just in interests of "justice" (after all, it's only a game) but because players' salaries, bonuses, and especially their ultimate consideration as Hall of Fame candidates depend heavily on such accolades. The prime example I used, and the original inspiration for the listing, was an NFL broadcast with a graphic comparing the statistics of inside linebackers London Fletcher and Ray Lewis; over a certain period, their stats were remarkably similar (and a couple of Fletcher's slightly better), yet Fletcher had never been to a single Pro Bowl while Lewis was selected nearly every year of his career.

I used to try to explain my reasoning on the subject, but these days, why bother? A majority of our people have consistently demonstrated that they are impervious to reasoning, so any argument is just another somethin' that somebody says and it all counts the same anyway. But I will only post the players that I thought were most clearly deserving of being more than a 4th or 5th "Pro Bowl alternate."
 

NFC

Offense
RB: Kyren Williams, LA Rams
WR: Mike Evans, TB Buccaneers; Darnell Mooney, Atlanta Falcons
OT: Brian O'Neill, Minnesota Vikings
OG: Kevin Zeitler, Detroit Lions

Defense
DT: Kobie Turner, LA Rams
DE: Leonard Williams, Seattle Seahawks
CB: Alontae Taylor, NO Saints; Michael Jackson, Carolina Panthers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

AFC

Offense
WR: Courtland Sutton, Denver Broncos
TE: Jonnu Smith, Miami Dolphins
OT: Mike McGlinchey, Denver Broncos; Spencer Brown, Buffalo Bills
OG: Ben Powers, Denver Broncos; Quinn Meinerz, Denver Broncos
C: Luke Wattenberg, Denver Broncos

Defense
DT: Zach Sieler, Miami Dolphins
DE: Danielle Hunter, Houston Texans
LB: Kyle Van Noy, Baltimore Ravens; Robert Spillane, LV Raiders
S: Nick Cross, Indianapolis Colts

Return Specialist: Derius Davis, LA Chargers

Translate